THE BEST OF 2018; WHERE SETTING IS THE REAL STAR
Now that it's the end of the year, media critics
are submitting their favorite films and TV shows of 2018. Which then soon
starts an avalanche of international awards, like The Golden Globes
and Academy Awards. It's interesting to see if our own personal "
bests" win any of those awards. They should. After all, we select
special works that people may neglect, not recognizing that they are extraordinary?
We critics, in other words, have better aesthetic taste than the so-
called media "judges" who are considered primarily
representatives of popular culture, not "art." What's more, we
critics don't, hopefully, single out winning media for political reasons ( ie.
It's Joe Smith's turn to garner a best actor award because he's getting
old ).
While describing what media
critics are and are not, I have often wondered what characteristics we do
consider when picking the "Best." The obvious criteria include
acting, story/plot, directing, setting, theme. Most experts say the story is
prime, but acting probably plays an equal part. Then again, maybe several
components are responsible. Art is complicated.
My particular
"BESTS" of 2018 are a little quirky. First, since I didn't see
many new TV and movies this year ( as I usually do ), I picked
works that were often released in 2017 although I saw them in 2018.
More importantly, this selection process forced me to determine what I really
liked about these works. I was surprised by the results. What grabbed me
most is the one trait that is probably not considered in a salient way:
setting/environment.
BEST IN TV:
DOC MARTIN ( Fiction ): The
BBC programs all seemingly have something in common, using mostly
England's landscape for a backdrop. "Doc Martin" is the best in my
opinion because I have visited the environs where it's been shot for several
years. I feel comfortable there, I want to live there some day ( Port Isaac in
Southwest England ), I love the quaintness of the villages and sea. Of course,
the characters are delightfully idiosyncratic, just like the setting.
SHERLOCK HOLMES ( Fiction ):
This English program is equally kooky and challenging, London's environment
becoming surreal ( with Magic Realism thrown in ) at times; the
characters and plot are similarly surreal, combined with Magic Realism as
well.
NATURE- BIG CATS (
Non-Fiction ): Part of PBS' "Nature" Series, a particular episode
features three programs on big cats throughout the world. Seeing diverse
landscapes is mesmerizing, but portrayals of the animals are exceptional; they
are as human as I have ever seen, each with a distinct personality. The
photography is equally authentic, thus placing the viewers themselves
among the big cats on the planet.
BEST IN MOVIES:
CALL ME BY YOUR NAME (
Fiction): While the sensitive plot about the relationship between two gay
students gets viewers' attention, the Northern Italian location is the
film's star. This is quite a feat considering that the older protagonist is a
simply gorgeous man. The characters and environs blend, becoming metaphors that
explain each other.
THE SHAPE OF WATER ( Fiction
): Another mixture of Surrealism and Magic Realism, this fantasy film ( combined
with bits of horror ) has salient themes taken from many cultural resources.
Yet it's the presence of water that pervades, especially the ending scene near
the Baltimore Harbor. It's a setting I know well. After all, I am from
Baltimore.
You're right about characters and settings blending to make a whole, I would even say it's an element in the making of a masterpiece (in any art form). I didn't see much this year, everything I did see was on TV and I too loved the big cats on Nature. I don't have a best-of list, I didn't see enough that was new. Also, I often find if I see something I find Great, seeing it later it seems less so; and vice versa.
ReplyDelete