ALL THE NEWS THAT FITS
By
guest blogger Ruby Baresch
The other day I noticed that
Judy Woodruff, long-time PBS Newshour anchor, looked somewhat different, rather
pale? When she announced that she was broadcasting from home, I thought, Aha!
Another new visual to get used to.
Two or three months ago, when
you turned on the television news, you knew you would get, visually, well-dressed
presenters sitting companionably in a studio with professional lighting making
them look good, if somewhat alike. Guest experts in their own offices, also
with good lighting. Reporters in the field who often sent reports via their
phones, with occasional glitches in the reception.
That was then. Now a news
broadcast features possibly an anchor in the studio and everyone else mostly
broadcasting remotely, i.e., from home. There is uncertainty as to what we will
see and I rather welcome it. From very high end technology, well-defined faces
against the light, to others, maybe those on Skype or Zoom, looking washed out,
their faces (too close to the camera?) sometimes distorted like bad selfies,
and the sound not always coming through properly.
The biggest change, I think,
is that we now get a glimpse into the private lives of our newscasters and
their guests, at least a thin slice of it. A chance to find out what they’re really
like when we see the corner they choose to show us. I wonder if this changes
how we perceive them? Do they seem more accessible but less professional? Did
the high production values of the studio, the visual perfection as it were,
induce trust in the product or put us off somewhat, or both?
My impression is that we still
value and trust the news shows (according to political beliefs), perhaps
because we need them, lo-fi visuals notwithstanding.
We used to distract ourselves
by critiquing the clothes newscasters wore, especially the women. Hair styles
likewise. Now I cast my eyes on the bookshelves and wish the cameras were close
enough for me to read titles. Instead I look for organization: this shelf of
books standing tall in perfect order looks rather unused; another has books on
their sides on top of vertical ones and I smugly note that it is more
disorderly than mine.
What parts of this new format may
endure when everyone can go to work again can’t be imagined as yet. It may not
be sustainable. Judy Woodruff commented on the amount of hard technical work
required to make her broadcasting from
home possible. Another remote worker turned his camera around to show what was
behind it, a big pile of cables, power strips, and devices. Studio broadcasts
will be more economical but we may still need Skype and Zoom.
Or, there’s always NPR.
Comments
Post a Comment