ALL THE NEWS THAT FITS

By guest blogger Ruby Baresch




The other day I noticed that Judy Woodruff, long-time PBS Newshour anchor, looked somewhat different, rather pale? When she announced that she was broadcasting from home, I thought, Aha! Another new visual to get used to.

Two or three months ago, when you turned on the television news, you knew you would get, visually, well-dressed presenters sitting companionably in a studio with professional lighting making them look good, if somewhat alike. Guest experts in their own offices, also with good lighting. Reporters in the field who often sent reports via their phones, with occasional glitches in the reception.

That was then. Now a news broadcast features possibly an anchor in the studio and everyone else mostly broadcasting remotely, i.e., from home. There is uncertainty as to what we will see and I rather welcome it. From very high end technology, well-defined faces against the light, to others, maybe those on Skype or Zoom, looking washed out, their faces (too close to the camera?) sometimes distorted like bad selfies, and the sound not always coming through properly.

The biggest change, I think, is that we now get a glimpse into the private lives of our newscasters and their guests, at least a thin slice of it. A chance to find out what they’re really like when we see the corner they choose to show us. I wonder if this changes how we perceive them? Do they seem more accessible but less professional? Did the high production values of the studio, the visual perfection as it were, induce trust in the product or put us off somewhat, or both?

My impression is that we still value and trust the news shows (according to political beliefs), perhaps because we need them, lo-fi visuals notwithstanding.

We used to distract ourselves by critiquing the clothes newscasters wore, especially the women. Hair styles likewise. Now I cast my eyes on the bookshelves and wish the cameras were close enough for me to read titles. Instead I look for organization: this shelf of books standing tall in perfect order looks rather unused; another has books on their sides on top of vertical ones and I smugly note that it is more disorderly than mine.  

What parts of this new format may endure when everyone can go to work again can’t be imagined as yet. It may not be sustainable. Judy Woodruff commented on the amount of hard technical work required to make her broadcasting  from home possible. Another remote worker turned his camera around to show what was behind it, a big pile of cables, power strips, and devices. Studio broadcasts will be more economical but we may still need Skype and Zoom.

Or, there’s always NPR.  




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THE BEST OF 2018; WHERE SETTING IS THE REAL STAR

Now that it's the end of the year, media critics are submitting their favorite films and TV shows of 2018. Which then soon starts  an avalanche of international  awards, like The Golden Globes and Academy Awards. It's interesting to see if our own personal " bests" win any of those awards. They should. After all,  we select special works that people may neglect, not recognizing that they are extraordinary?  We  critics, in other words, have better aesthetic taste than the so- called  media "judges" who are considered primarily representatives of popular culture, not "art."  What's more, we critics don't, hopefully, single out winning media for political reasons ( ie. It's Joe Smith's turn to garner a  best actor award because he's getting old ).     While describing what media critics are and are not, I have often wondered what characteristics we do consider when picking the "Best." The obvious criteria  include
Read more

FAKE NEWS: THE SEARCH FOR TRUTH

     The expression FAKE NEWS has become a popular and important one in today's political arena. Yet Fake News has been around for a long time, going back to the idea of "Yellow Journalism" coined in the mid 1890s (where it meant little or no well-researched news). Annenberg School's Dr. Kathleen Hall Jamieson, a well-known rhetorical scholar, is probably one of  the only persons to make sense of it in its present context.  She labeled the term an OXYMORON ( " contradictory terms appearing in conjunction with each other")  and she was right on the button. In other words, "Fake" is not real; "News" is  authentic.       Analyzing the term further, It is the nature of TRUTH that defines fake news.      One characterization is truth's ambiguity.  What truth is to one person may not be so to another individual. It seem to this critic that truth may be equated with personal perceptions:  "the mental process through which we int
Read more

"STATE OF THE UNION AND THE OSCARS: BEST TV PRODUCTIONS OF THE YEAR"

      Each year there are lots of traditional TV programs that give credence to American culture. Some are entertaining and exciting, remaining in our memory. But there are some which are pretty boring.  Last week, however, President's Biden's "State of the Union" and the "96 th  Academy Awards" did not put the average viewer asleep like examples from the past.      There were many reasons why, such explanations being somewhat similar. Because TV is a visual medium, the images we saw in the two productions were unusually arresting this year. This is not  suggesting that President Biden's speech resembled a Broadway play, for instance, even though the female Congressional members wearing white clothing did garner attention and convey a theme like a Broadway show.       Simply stated, the images at the Oscars were the best in years. The reason was rather obvious, communicating the adage, "Less is more."  The set was uncomplicated and did not atte
Read more